4.7 Review

The mismeasure of conservation

Journal

TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
Volume 36, Issue 9, Pages 808-821

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.06.008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Global Environment Facility's Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel
  2. Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The basic purpose of protected areas and effective conservation interventions is to achieve conservation impact, including avoiding biodiversity loss and promoting recovery. However, when setting targets, it is important to consider actual impact and prioritize investment in areas where conservation impact can be most effectively achieved.
One of the basic purposes of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation interventions is to achieve conservation impact, the sum of avoided biodiversity loss and promoted recovery relative to outcomes without protection. In the context of the Convention on Biological Diversity's negotiations on the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, we find that targets for area-based interventions are framed overwhelmingly with measures that fail to inform decision-makers about impact and that risk diverting limited resources away from achieving it. We show that predicting impact in space and time is feasible and can provide the basis for global guidance for jurisdictions to develop targets for conservation impact and shift investment priorities to areas where impact can be most effectively achieved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available