4.6 Review

The ciliary impact of nonciliary gene mutations

Journal

TRENDS IN CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 11, Pages 876-887

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2021.06.001

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Spain Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MICINN) [PGC2018-099562-B-I00]
  2. Agency for Management of University and Research (AGAUR) [2017 SGR 1089]
  3. Fundacio la Marato de TV3 [202019-30-31-32]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
  5. Centres de Recerca de Catalunya (CERCA) (Generalitat de Catalunya)
  6. Spain Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [BES-2017-080198, SEV-2015-0500-17-4]
  7. Institute for Research in Biomedicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutations in genes encoding centriolar or ciliary proteins cause ciliopathies. There are numerous disorders with clinical features similar to ciliopathies listed in the Human Phenotype Ontology database, but they do not involve defects in the centriole-cilium proteome. Defects in different cellular compartments may indirectly impair cilia and cause additional, nonciliopathy phenotypes.
Mutations in genes encoding centriolar or ciliary proteins cause diseases collec-tively known as 'ciliopathies'. Interestingly, the Human Phenotype Ontology database lists numerous disorders that display clinical features reminiscent of ciliopathies but do not involve defects in the centriole-cilium proteome. Instead, defects in different cellular compartments may impair cilia indirectly and cause additional, nonciliopathy phenotypes. This phenotypic heterogeneity, perhaps combined with the field's centriole-cilium-centric view, may have hindered the recognition of ciliary contributions. Identifying these diseases and dissecting how the underlying gene mutations impair cilia not only will add to our under -standing of cilium assembly and function but also may open up new therapeutic avenues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available