4.7 Article

In-plane elasticity of a novel vertical strut combined re-entrant honeycomb structure with negative Poisson's ratio

Journal

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
Volume 163, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.107634

Keywords

Negative Poisson?s ratio; Vertical strut; Re-entrant; Elastic module

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [E2019210278]
  2. Education Department Project of Hebei Province [QN2019149]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11872253, 12072203, 11872257]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new vertical strut combined re-entrant auxetic structure has been designed and studied for its mechanical behaviors. Results showed that lightweight structures can significantly enhance auxetic behavior and achieve a high degree of anisotropy compared with conventional re-entrant honeycomb configurations.
In this study, a new vertical strut combined re-entrant auxetic structure was designed and its mechanical behaviors have been studied. An analytical model was established based on energy theorems considering bending, shearing and stretching. Numerical simulations and experiments were both carried out to confirm the validity of the analytical model based on beam theory. Results exhibited a good agreement between the refined analytical model, the numerical simulation and experimental study. Four deformation mechanisms were analyzed and the effect of deformation on the effective Poisson?s ratio (EPR) and elastic module were investigated. A parametric study was further performed to quantitatively illustrate the influences of the geometrical parameters on the effective elasticity properties of the designed structure. The results showed that the lightweight structures can significantly enhance the auxetic behavior and achieve a high degree of anisotropy with wide vertical strut lengths and internal angles compared with conventional re-entrant honeycomb configurations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available