4.7 Article

Using knowledge to care for country: Indigenous-led evaluations of research to adaptively co-manage Kakadu National Park, Australia

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 377-390

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s11625-021-01015-9

Keywords

Indigenous-led research; Evaluation; Knowledge co-production

Funding

  1. Australian Government's National Environmental Science Program (NESP) Northern Australia Environmental Resources Hub
  2. CSIRO's Responsible Innovation Future Science Program (RI FSP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research on sustainability science conducted with Indigenous collaborators must be led by indigenous leaders to achieve impacts aligned with local values and priorities. Evaluation methods for such research are limited, but collaborative and adaptive approaches can help assess the effectiveness of research practices in addressing complex sustainable issues facing Indigenous lands. Indigenous-led evaluations of sustainability research can empower the usability and benefits of negotiated, shared, and co-created knowledge.
Sustainability science research conducted with Indigenous collaborators must be Indigenous-led and achieve impacts that are grounded in local values and priorities, both for ethical reasons and to achieve more robust outcomes. However, there has been limited focus on determining how best to evaluate the way research is used, shared and created to adaptively solve complex sustainable issues facing Indigenous lands. In this paper, we outline a collaborative and adaptive approach for conducting Indigenous-led evaluations of sustainability research and show how this approach was applied to evaluate cross-cultural knowledge co-production practice and impact in Australia's jointly managed and World Heritage-listed Kakadu National Park. As part of an Indigenous-led research project, indicators were co-developed by Indigenous and non-Indigenous research team members to monitor the health of the knowledge-sharing and co-production practices that underpinned the design, management and success of the project's research activities. The evaluations focused on determining whether research activities were providing negotiated benefits for local Indigenous people; helping to restore and protect agreed values in priority areas; and supporting Indigenous-led collaborative knowledge sharing and research practices. In Kakadu, we show how the Indigenous-led design of the research evaluation empowered the usability and benefits of knowledge which was negotiated, shared and co-created. The approach shows how sustainability science can be evaluated by Indigenous leaders to test if and how research practice and impact is responding to their priorities for their traditional estates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available