4.4 Article

Effects of bisphenol S and bisphenol F on human spermatozoa: An in vitro study

Journal

REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages 58-63

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2021.05.011

Keywords

Bisphenols; Sperm motility; Sperm viability; Oxidative stress; ROS; Mitochondria; Flow cytometry

Funding

  1. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universit`a e della Ricerca, Italy (PRIN 2017)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that BPS and BPF appear to be safer alternatives to BPA for sperm biology, as they do not impact sperm mitochondrial functions, motility, and viability. These findings could assist regulatory agencies in identifying more secure chemicals for replacing BPA in industrial plastic production.
Bisphenol A (BPA), the main chemical monomer of epoxy resins and polycarbonate plastics, has generated concerns about its endocrine disruptor properties, along with the reported possible links with several human health disorders. Accordingly, some restrictions on its use have been recommended. Bisphenol S (BPS) and bisphenol F (BPF) are the main replacements to BPA, with which they share homologies in chemical structure. However, to date, little is known about their possible adverse effects for human reproduction. As the in vitro exposure of human spermatozoa to BPA induces oxidative/pro-apoptotic effects, the aim of the present study was to verify whether BPS and BPF could represent safer compounds for human sperm functions. The exposure of motile sperm suspensions to scalar concentrations of BPS or BPF for 4 h did not significantly reduce sperm motility (as assessed by computer-aided semen analysis) and viability. At flow cytometry, no changes in mitochondrial membrane potential, or mitochondrial generation of reactive oxygen species were detected by using the JC-1 and MitoSOX red probes, respectively. Interestingly, it nor even the combination of both BPS and BPF at the highest concentrations impaired sperm mitochondrial functions. In conclusion, BPS and BPF seem to be safer alternatives to BPA for sperm biology, as they do not affect mitochondrial functions, sperm motility and viability. These findings could help regulatory agencies to identify more secure chemicals to replace BPA in industrial production of plastics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available