4.3 Article

Two-person game with hesitant fuzzy payoff: An application in MADM

Journal

RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages 3087-3105

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/ro/2021149

Keywords

Matrix games; multiple attribute decision making; hesitant fuzzy set; aggregation operator; HHFOWA-TOPSIS

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) [09/599(0067)/2016-EMR-I]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hesitant Fuzzy Set (HFS) allows for a more effective modeling of real-life problems, while Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) involves evaluating multiple conflicting attributes. MADM problem deals with selecting the best alternative corresponding to multiple attributes.
Hesitant Fuzzy Set (HFS) permits the membership function having a collection of probable values which are more effective for modelling the real-life problems. Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) process apparently assesses multiple conflicting attribute in decision making. In traditional decision making problems, each player is moving independently whereas in reality it is seen that each player aims to maximize personal profit which causes a negative impact on other player. MADM problem treats with candidate to the best alternative corresponding to the several attributes. Here, we present an MADM problem under hesitant fuzzy information and then transforming it into two-person matrix game, referred to herein as MADM game. The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is one of the prominent approach for solving the MADM problems. In this work, we develop the TOPSIS based on Ordered Weighted Aggregation (OWA) operator and hybrid hesitant fuzzy normalized Euclidean distance.Please check whether short title on odd pages have been set correctly. Then the two approaches, namely Hybrid Hesitant Fuzzy Ordered Weighted Aggregation-TOPSIS (HHFOWA-TOPSIS) and the Linear Programming Problem (LPP) are applied to solve the formulated MADM game. For solving MADM game, we apply LPP by considering the various values of alpha,psi, and HHFOWA-TOPSIS for finding the optimal alternative according to their scores.Please provide missing AMS classification codes. An investment selection problem is included to explain the feasibility and superiority of our formulated approaches. A comparison analysis is drawn among the obtained results which are derived from the two approaches. LPP and HHFOWA-TOPSIS provide the best alternative for the proposed problem. Finally, conclusions about our findings and outlooks are described.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available