4.3 Review

What is known about human milk bank donors around the world: a systematic scoping review

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages 312-322

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980021003979

Keywords

Milk banking; Donors; Human milk; Donor milk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically evaluated research articles on milk bank donors and found that the current understanding of donors is mainly limited to single studies with variable reported variables.
Objective: The WHO recommends that low birth weight infants receive donor human milk (DHM) when mother's milk is not available. Systematic reviews have been published regarding clinical outcomes of infants receiving DHM, as well as the impact of pasteurisation on the composition of DHM; however, information about milk bank donors has not been systematically assessed. Design: We conducted a systematic scoping review of original research articles about milk bank donors published before August 2020. Setting: Globally. Participants: Donors to milk banks. Results: A total of twenty-eight studies were included across a variety of geographies: the USA (n 8), Brazil (n 7), Spain (n 4), India (n 2), and single studies in France, Norway, Poland, Italy, Taiwan, Korea and China. Study variables were grouped into six main categories: Donor Demographics (n 19), Clinical Characteristics (n 20), Donor Experiences (n 16), Donation Patterns (n 16), Lifestyle Characteristics (n 4) and Lactation/Breast-feeding History (n 8). Some demographic characteristics were commonly reported across regions, while other, including gender and race, were infrequently explored. Factors that might influence the composition of DHM, including birth timing (term or pre-term), milk type (colostrum, transition or mature) and maternal diet were not regularly studied. Other gaps in the literature included (1) donors' motivations and barriers to donation, (2) lactation and breast-feeding history, including factors that influence donors to pump and amass surplus milk, and (3) donation patterns, including whether donors are also selling milk to corporations or sharing milk with peers. Conclusion: What is known about milk bank donors in different geographies is often limited to a single study, with heterogeneity in the variables reported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available