4.7 Article

Medial amygdala ERα expression influences monogamous behaviour of male prairie voles in the field

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0318

Keywords

oestrogen receptor; prairie vole; RNAi; social monogamy

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health grant [1R15HD075222-01A1]
  2. American Museum of Natural History Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Fund
  3. NSF [1826745]
  4. Sigma Xi
  5. American Society of Mammalogists
  6. Division Of Human Resource Development
  7. Direct For Education and Human Resources [1826745] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The formation of long-term pair-bonds involves multiple neural circuits and is context-dependent, with inhibition of oestrogen receptor alpha in the medial amygdala of male prairie voles shown to significantly increase social monogamy expression in the field.
Formation of long-term pair-bonds is a complex process, involving multiple neural circuits and is context- and experience-dependent. While laboratory studies using prairie voles have identified the involvement of several neural mechanisms, efforts to translate these findings into predictable field outcomes have been inconsistent at best. Here we test the hypothesis that inhibition of oestrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) in the medial amygdala of male prairie voles would significantly increase the expression of social monogamy in the field. Prairie vole populations of equal sex ratio were established in outdoor enclosures with males bred for high levels of ER alpha expression and low levels of prosocial behaviour associated with social monogamy. Medial amygdala ER alpha expression was knocked down in half the males per population. Knockdown males displayed a greater degree of social monogamy in five of the eight behavioural indices assessed. This study demonstrates the robust nature of ER alpha in playing a critical role in the expression of male social monogamy in a field setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available