Radiomics machine learning study with a small sample size: Single random training-test set split may lead to unreliable results
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Radiomics machine learning study with a small sample size: Single random training-test set split may lead to unreliable results
Authors
Keywords
Meningioma, Magnetic resonance imaging, Brain metastasis, Machine learning, Glioblastoma multiforme, Metastasis, Data acquisition, Cancers and neoplasms
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages e0256152
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2021-08-13
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0256152
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Quality assessment of meningioma radiomics studies: Bridging the gap between exploratory research and clinical applications
- (2021) So Yeon Won et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
- Robust performance of deep learning for distinguishing glioblastoma from single brain metastasis using radiomic features: model development and validation
- (2020) Sohi Bae et al. Scientific Reports
- External validation of prognostic models: what, why, how, when and where?
- (2020) Chava L Ramspek et al. Clinical Kidney Journal
- Accuracy of Deep Learning to Differentiate the Histopathological Grading of Meningiomas on MR Images: A Preliminary Study
- (2019) Tommaso Banzato et al. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
- Towards clinical application of image mining: a systematic review on artificial intelligence and radiomics
- (2019) Martina Sollini et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING
- Quality of science and reporting of radiomics in oncologic studies: room for improvement according to radiomics quality score and TRIPOD statement
- (2019) Ji Eun Park et al. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
- Radiomics-Based Machine Learning in Differentiation Between Glioblastoma and Metastatic Brain Tumors
- (2019) Chaoyue Chen et al. Frontiers in Oncology
- Machine learning algorithm validation with a limited sample size
- (2019) Andrius Vabalas et al. PLoS One
- The Diagnostic Value of Radiomics-Based Machine Learning in Predicting the Grade of Meningiomas Using Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Preliminary Study
- (2019) Chaoyue Chen et al. Frontiers in Oncology
- Radiomics and machine learning may accurately predict the grade and histological subtype in meningiomas using conventional and diffusion tensor imaging
- (2018) Yae Won Park et al. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
- Diagnostic challenges in meningioma
- (2017) Martha Nowosielski et al. NEURO-ONCOLOGY
- Cross-validation failure: Small sample sizes lead to large error bars
- (2017) Gaël Varoquaux NEUROIMAGE
- External validation is only needed when prediction models are worth it (Letter commenting on: J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68:25-34)
- (2016) Forike K. Martens et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Response to letter by Forike et al.: more rigorous, not less, external validation is needed
- (2016) George C.M. Siontis et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Prediction models need appropriate internal, internal–external, and external validation
- (2016) Ewout W. Steyerberg et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Events per variable (EPV) and the relative performance of different strategies for estimating the out-of-sample validity of logistic regression models
- (2014) Peter C Austin et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data
- (2009) Alon Halevy et al. IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
- Data splitting for artificial neural networks using SOM-based stratified sampling
- (2009) R.J. May et al. NEURAL NETWORKS
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started