4.8 Article

Three-Dimensional Soundproof Acoustic Metacage

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 127, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.084301

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFA0211400, 2020YFA0211300, 2017YFA0303702]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11974176, 61975078, 11774167, 11634005, 11974177]
  3. State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [11834008]
  4. MINECO through a Ramon y Cajal grant [RYC-2015-17156]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [714577 PHONOMETA]
  6. Exxon Mobil through the MIT Energy Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a three-dimensional soundproof acoustic cage structure, named as an acoustic metacage, is theoretically proposed and experimentally demonstrated. The novel physical mechanism to open a low-frequency broad partial band gap and the robustness of the soundproofing effect against airflow perturbation are highlighted. This research paves the way for low-frequency airborne soundproof structures in the presence of ventilation.
In this Letter, we theoretically propose and experimentally demonstrate a three-dimensional soundproof acoustic cage structure, hereby denoted as an acoustic metacage. The metacage is composed of six acoustic metamaterial slabs with open holes and hidden bypass space coiling tunnels connected to the holes. Band structure analysis reveals a novel physical mechanism to open a low-frequency broad partial band gap via the band folding in other directions, which can also be interpreted by an effective medium with indefinite effective mass density and negative effective modulus. Transmission loss in simulations and in the acoustic impedance tube are administered. Strikingly, we prove that the soundproofing effect of the metacage is robust against the airflow perturbation induced by a fan. Our work paves a road for low-frequency airborne soundproof structures in the presence of ventilation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available