4.4 Review

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy versus antibiotics as an adjunct in the treatment of periodontitis and peri-implantitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102231

Keywords

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy; Antibiotics; Periodontitis; Peri-implantitis; Systematic review; Meta-analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81801024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The clinical efficacy of adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and antibiotics in the treatment of periodontitis and peri-implantitis showed equal evidence, with significant reduction of the red complex in both diseases. However, due to protocol heterogeneity in studies and limited number of trials, the comparative conclusion remains inconclusive. Future long-term clinical trials with standardized protocols are needed to provide a firm conclusion.
Background: Clinical efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as compared to antibiotics in periodontitis and peri-implantitis has been tested in several clinical trials. Yet controversial results were reported. The aim of the present study was to answer the question: Will adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy be more effective than antibiotics agent in the treatment of periodontitis and peri-implantitis?. Methods: Publications compared outcomes between aPDT and antibiotics in adult patients with periodontitis or peri-implantitis, containing more than 3-month follow-up duration, were involved in the systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central were searched until December of 2020. Clinical parameters including pocket probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were evaluated. The risk of bias was assessed by Cochrane Collaboration Tool. Weighted mean differences (WMD), 95 % confidence interval(CI) and heterogeneity were estimated by Review Manager software. Results: 10 trials in periodontitis and 5 trials in peri-implantitis were included. Meta-analysis outcomes revealed equal clinical evidence for aPDT and antibiotics in periodontitis and peri-implantitis. In addition, aPDT significantly reduced the red complex in both diseases. However, owing to the heterogeneity of protocols in articles and the limited number of studies, the comparative conclusion remained unconfirmed. Conclusion: aPDT can be considered as an alternative to antibiotics in the treatment of peri-implantitis and periodontitis. Given that high heterogeneity in outcome was found in this review, future long-term clinical trials with standard aPDT and antibiotic treatment should be tested to arrive at a firm conclusion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available