Hydrogen peroxide assisted endoscopic necrosectomy for walled-off pancreatic necrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and aims: Endoscopic necrosectomy (EN) is the preferred approach for management of symptomatic or infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) has been reported to be a good adjunctive therapy for EN. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate effectiveness and safety of H2O2 assisted EN for WOPN. Methods: A comprehensive search of multiple databases (through December 2020) was performed to identify studies that reported outcomes of H2O2 assisted EN for WOPN. Outcomes assessed included clinical success, technical success, and adverse events. Results: A total of 454 patients with mean age (47.3 +/- 7.9 years) and WOPN size (12.4 +/- 3.1 cm) were included from 15 studies. The median H2O2 concentration was 3% (range 0.1-3%), with dilution and volume ranging from 1:1 to 10:1 and 20 ml to 1 L, respectively. The rates of technical success, clinical success and adverse events was 97.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94.8-98.6, I2 = 0), 89.8% (95% CI: 86.3-92.5, I2 = 0) and 17.9% (95% CI: 12.6-24.7, I2 = 38), respectively. The most common adverse event was bleeding (7.1%) followed by stent migration (5.3%). On meta-regression, WOPN size, patient age, use of metal stent, number of necrosectomies and transgastric access were not significant predictor for technical success, clinical success or adverse events. Conclusion: H2O2 assisted EN is effective and safe for management of WOPN. Its use may be encouraged, and future randomized controlled studies are needed to study the optimal technique, concentration and best predictors of success. (c) 2021 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Superscript/Subscript Available

Automated summary

The study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of H2O2-assisted EN for management of WOPN, showing high rates of technical and clinical success with low incidence of adverse events. Factors such as WOPN size, patient age, and use of stents were not significant predictors of success.