4.7 Article

Balancing conservation goals and ecotourism development in coastal wetland management in Sri Lanka: A choice experiment

Journal

OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 210, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105659

Keywords

Willingness to pay; Tourism; Biodiversity conservation; Valuation workshops

Funding

  1. Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation NORHED climate change project [SRV/13/0010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Foreign tourists in Rekawa coastal wetland in Southern Sri Lanka show a preference for guided-boat trips and beach cleanup activities in ecotourism development, as well as willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation efforts. The study also reveals that many tourists may have expressed their values and contributions based on their potential return or intention to visit in the future.
Understanding the tradeoff between tourism development and environmental conservation is essential for the sustainable management of ecotourism. Accordingly, we conducted a choice experiment (CE) using valuation workshops to estimate the preferences of foreign tourists for ecotourism development and biodiversity conservation in Rekawa coastal wetland in Southern Sri Lanka. Transforming preferences into marginal willingness to pay (MWTP), shows that guided-boat trips in Rekawa lagoon is the most important development attribute, followed by increased beach cleanup activities. The MWTP for smaller turtle-watching groups is much lower, but still significant. Tourists are also willing to pay for conservation in the form of efforts to reduce losses in biodiversity. The fact that the CE asks for contributions to future management and improvement fund, and because that many tourists do not intend to return to Rekawa, this implies that elicited values can be interpreted as either non-use or option values for those who intend to return.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available