- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Risk prediction tools for cancer in primary care
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages 1645-1650
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2015-12-04
DOI
10.1038/bjc.2015.409
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Cancer Risk Assessment Tools in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
- (2015) J. G. Walker et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement
- (2015) Gary S. Collins et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Implementing a QCancer risk tool into general practice consultations: an exploratory study using simulated consultations with Australian general practitioners
- (2015) P P-C Chiang et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Selecting High-Risk Individuals for Lung Cancer Screening: A Prospective Evaluation of Existing Risk Models and Eligibility Criteria in the German EPIC Cohort
- (2015) K. Li et al. Cancer Prevention Research
- Development and validation of risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of common cancers in men and women: prospective cohort study
- (2015) J. Hippisley-Cox et al. BMJ Open
- Do prostate cancer risk models improve the predictive accuracy of PSA screening? A meta-analysis
- (2014) K. S. Louie et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Risk Prediction Models for Melanoma: A Systematic Review
- (2014) J. A. Usher-Smith et al. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
- Exploring GPs’ experiences of using diagnostic tools for cancer: a qualitative study in primary care
- (2014) Trish Green et al. FAMILY PRACTICE
- Evaluation of risk assessment tools for suspected cancer in general practice: a cohort study
- (2013) William Hamilton et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
- Identifying patients with undetected pancreatic cancer in primary care: an independent and external validation of QCancer®(Pancreas)
- (2013) Gary S Collins et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
- Incorporating genomics into breast and prostate cancer screening: assessing the implications
- (2013) Susmita Chowdhury et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model Research
- (2013) Ewout W. Steyerberg et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Aid-Assisted Decision Making and Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2012) Paul C. Schroy et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer: A Review
- (2012) A. K. Win et al. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
- Effect of Preventive Messages Tailored to Family History on Health Behaviors: The Family Healthware Impact Trial
- (2011) M. T. Ruffin et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- A systematic review of breast cancer incidence risk prediction models with meta-analysis of their performance
- (2011) Catherine Meads et al. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
- The diagnostic performance of scoring systems to identify symptomatic colorectal cancer compared to current referral guidance
- (2011) T. Marshall et al. GUT
- Barriers to Routine Risk-Score Use for Healthy Primary Care Patients
- (2010) Falk Müller-Riemenschneider ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- What are effective strategies to communicate cardiovascular risk information to patients? A systematic review
- (2010) Cherry-Ann Waldron et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- The CAPER studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients
- (2009) W Hamilton BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Transparency in Risk Communication
- (2008) Elke Kurz-Milcke et al. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started