4.6 Article

The immune landscape of common CNS malignancies: implications for immunotherapy

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages 729-744

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41571-021-00518-9

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1CA120813, R01NS120547, P30 CA016672]
  2. Ben and Catherine Ivy Foundation
  3. MD Anderson GBM Moonshot
  4. Traver Walsh Foundation
  5. Brockman Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immunotherapy has shown remarkable therapeutic responses in treating various cancers, with exceptions like glioblastoma. Immune profiling of samples from central nervous system tumors and brain metastases has revealed fundamental differences in immune composition, providing guidance for novel immunotherapeutic strategies.
Immunotherapy has enabled remarkable therapeutic responses across cancers of various lineages, albeit with some notable exceptions such as glioblastoma. Several previous misconceptions, which have impaired progress in the past, including the presence and role of the blood-brain barrier and a lack of lymphatic drainage, have been refuted. Nonetheless, a subset of patients with brain metastases but, paradoxically, not the vast majority of those with gliomas are able to respond to immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Immune profiling of samples obtained from patients with central nervous system malignancies using techniques such as mass cytometry and single-cell sequencing along with experimental data from genetically engineered mouse models have revealed fundamental differences in immune composition and immunobiology that not only explain the differences in responsiveness to these agents but also lay the foundations for immunotherapeutic strategies that are applicable to gliomas. Herein, we review the emerging data on the differences in immune cell composition, function and interactions within central nervous system tumours and provide guidance on the development of novel immunotherapies for these historically difficult-to-treat cancers. Patients with primary central nervous system (CNS) malignancies largely do not derive benefit from immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Paradoxically, a subset of those with CNS metastases from tumours located outside of the CNS will respond to the same approach. In this Perspective, the authors explore the key differences in the immune cell composition of primary CNS malignancies and brain metastases and provide guidance on potential alternative immunotherapies that might be effective in patients with these historically difficult-to-treat malignancies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available