4.8 Article

Best practices and tools for reporting reproducible fluorescence microscopy methods

Journal

NATURE METHODS
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages 1463-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-021-01156-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH-NINDS Neuroscience Center [P30 NS045892]
  2. NIH-NICHD Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center [P50 HD103573]
  3. Chan Zuckerberg Initiative DAF [2019-198107]
  4. Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
  5. National Institutes of Health [F31-NS-108406]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article provides comprehensive guidelines and resources to improve accurate reporting for the most common fluorescence light microscopy modalities, with the aim of enhancing the reporting, rigor, and reproducibility of microscopy techniques. The importance of appropriate microscopy methods reporting is emphasized, and efforts are made to educate researchers on how microscopy metadata influence data interpretation. The ultimate goal is to enhance the quality, rigor, and reproducibility of image-based science through improved microscopy reporting.
Comprehensive guidelines and resources to enable accurate reporting for the most common fluorescence light microscopy modalities are reported with the goal of improving microscopy reporting, rigor and reproducibility. Although fluorescence microscopy is ubiquitous in biomedical research, microscopy methods reporting is inconsistent and perhaps undervalued. We emphasize the importance of appropriate microscopy methods reporting and seek to educate researchers about how microscopy metadata impact data interpretation. We provide comprehensive guidelines and resources to enable accurate reporting for the most common fluorescence light microscopy modalities. We aim to improve microscopy reporting, thus improving the quality, rigor and reproducibility of image-based science.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available