4.6 Article

Deaggregation of multi-hazard damages, losses, risks, and connectivity: an application to the joint seismic-tsunami hazard at Seaside, Oregon

Journal

NATURAL HAZARDS
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages 1821-1847

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-04900-9

Keywords

Multiple hazards; Seismic-tsunami; Deaggregation; Social impacts; Resilience

Funding

  1. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [70NANB15H044]
  2. Colorado State University [70NANB15H044]
  3. Civil and Construction Engineering Graduate Fellowship from Oregon State University
  4. U.S Department of Commerce

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a methodology to deaggregate the results of multi-hazard damage analysis by considering both population characteristics and independent hazards. The methodology is applied to a joint seismic-tsunami hazard study, and the deaggregated results provide insights for community resilience planning. By analyzing damages across various dimensions, the methodology allows for a better understanding of risks and vulnerabilities in infrastructure systems.
This paper presents a methodology to deaggregate the results of a multi-hazard damage analysis by extending the traditional multi-hazard damage analysis to consider both population characteristics and independent hazards. The methodology is applied to the joint seismic-tsunami hazard at Seaside, Oregon, considering four infrastructure systems: (1) buildings, (2) transportation network, (3) electric power network and (4) water supply network. Damages to all infrastructure systems are evaluated, and the networked infrastructures are used to inform parcel connectivity to critical facilities. US Census data and a probabilistic housing unit allocation method are implemented to assign detailed household demographic characteristics at the parcel level. Six dimensions of deaggregation are introduced: (1) spatial, (2) hazard type, (3) hazard intensity, (4) infrastructure system, (5) infrastructure component, and (6) housing unit characteristics. The damages, economic losses and risks, and connectivity to critical facilities are deaggregated across these six dimensions. The results show that deaggregated economic loss and risk plots can allow community resilience planners the ability to isolate high-risk events, as well as provide insights into the underlying driving forces. Geospatial representation of the results allows for the identification of both vulnerable buildings and areas within a community and is highlighted by the spatial pattern of parcel disconnection from critical facilities. The incorporation of population characteristics provides an understanding of how hazards disproportionately impact population subgroups and can aide in equitable resilience planning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Environmental Sciences

Methodology for Identifying a Subset of Representative Storm Surge Hydrographs from a Coastal Storm Modeling Database

Dylan R. Sanderson, Mark B. Gravens, Rusty L. Permenter

JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH (2019)

Article Engineering, Civil

A spatially explicit decision support framework for parcel- and community-level resilience assessment using Bayesian networks

Dylan Sanderson, Daniel Cox, Gowtham Naraharisetty

Summary: A spatially explicit decision support framework was developed using Bayesian networks to quantify parcel- and community-level resilience against natural hazards. Applying this framework to Seaside, Oregon, the study showed overall low resilience for a 1,000-yr event under status quo conditions, improvement of resilience with mitigation options, and the least resilience to mid-magnitude events.

SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE (2022)

Article Engineering, Civil

Modeling Regional and Local Resilience of Infrastructure Networks Following Disruptions from Natural Hazards

Dylan Sanderson, Daniel Cox, Andre R. Barbosa, John Bolte

Summary: This paper presents a framework to evaluate the resilience of infrastructure networks after natural hazards. A case study of a road and highway transportation network disrupted by an earthquake and tsunami scenario is used to demonstrate the framework's application. The results highlight the factors influencing regional and local resilience and emphasize the importance of considering local networks within larger regional networks.

JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS (2022)

Article Environmental Sciences

Coupled Urban Change and Natural Hazard Consequence Model for Community Resilience Planning

Dylan R. Sanderson, Daniel T. Cox, Mehrshad Amini, Andre R. Barbosa

Summary: This paper presents a new coupled urban change and hazard consequence model that considers population growth, a changing built environment, natural hazard mitigation planning, and future acute hazards. The model is applied to Seaside, Oregon, and shows that the most effective policies are those that incorporate elements of both urban planning and enforced building codes.

EARTHS FUTURE (2022)

Article Geosciences, Multidisciplinary

Methodology to incorporate seismic damage and debris to evaluate strategies to reduce life safety risk for multi-hazard earthquake and tsunami

Mehrshad Amini, Dylan R. Sanderson, Daniel T. Cox, Andre R. Barbosa, Nathanael Rosenheim

Summary: This paper presents a methodology to evaluate the life safety risk of coastal communities vulnerable to seismic and tsunami hazards by incorporating the effects of earthquake-induced damage to buildings and debris on evacuation time. The study focuses on the city of Seaside, Oregon, and uses fragility analysis to estimate seismic damage and resulting debris. The results indicate a significant increase in fatality and life safety risk when building egress and earthquake-induced debris are considered, and implementing mitigation strategies can reduce fatalities by 90%.

NATURAL HAZARDS (2023)

Article Geosciences, Multidisciplinary

Comparison of national and local building inventories for damage and loss modeling of seismic and tsunami hazards: From parcel-to city-scale

Dylan Sanderson, Daniel Cox

Summary: This paper compares the National Structure Inventory with a local tax assessor building inventory in modeling seismic-tsunami hazards. The study focuses on the city of Seaside, Oregon, and finds significant differences in input attributes at the parcel level, but more consistent results when aggregated at larger spatial scales. The National Structure Inventory consistently underestimates structure value and number of stories compared to the tax assessor data, and is more accurate when aggregated at increased spatial scales.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION (2023)

No Data Available