Reliability, construct and concurrent validity of a smartphone-based cognition test in multiple sclerosis
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Reliability, construct and concurrent validity of a smartphone-based cognition test in multiple sclerosis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 135245852110181
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Online
2021-05-26
DOI
10.1177/13524585211018103
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Brief international cognitive assessment for multiple sclerosis (BICAMS) cut-off scores for detecting cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis
- (2021) Artemios Artemiadis et al. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
- Recovery of cognitive function after relapse in multiple sclerosis
- (2020) Ralph HB Benedict et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- We should monitor our patients with wearable technology instead of neurological examination – Commentary
- (2020) Giampaolo Brichetto Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Wearable technologies to measure clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis: A scoping review
- (2020) Sarah Alexander et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: clinical management, MRI, and therapeutic avenues
- (2020) Ralph H B Benedict et al. LANCET NEUROLOGY
- Symbol Digit Modalities Test Variant in a Smartphone App for Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: Validation Study
- (2020) Pim van Oirschot et al. JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- MSCopilot, a new Multiple Sclerosis self‐assessment digital solution: results of a comparative study versus standard tests
- (2019) Elisabeth Maillart et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
- Introducing Multiple Screener: An unsupervised digital screening tool for cognitive deficits in MS
- (2019) L. van Dongen et al. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
- Recommendations for cognitive screening and management in multiple sclerosis care
- (2018) Rosalind Kalb et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Processing speed test: Validation of a self-administered, iPad®-based tool for screening cognitive dysfunction in a clinic setting
- (2017) Stephen M Rao et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- The Nine-Hole Peg Test as a manual dexterity performance measure for multiple sclerosis
- (2017) Peter Feys et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Validity of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test as a cognition performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis
- (2017) Ralph HB Benedict et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Processing speed test: Validation of a self-administered, iPad®-based tool for screening cognitive dysfunction in a clinic setting
- (2017) Stephen M Rao et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- The Nine-Hole Peg Test as a manual dexterity performance measure for multiple sclerosis
- (2017) Peter Feys et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Validity of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test as a cognition performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis
- (2017) Ralph HB Benedict et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Preclinical disease activity in multiple sclerosis: A prospective study of cognitive performance prior to first symptom
- (2016) Marianna Cortese et al. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
- The Arm Function in Multiple Sclerosis Questionnaire (AMSQ): development and validation of a new tool using IRT methods
- (2015) Lidwine B. Mokkink et al. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
- Recommendations for a Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS)
- (2011) DW Langdon et al. Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- A 3-year longitudinal study of cognitive impairment in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis: Speed matters
- (2007) Douglas R. Denney et al. JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started