4.6 Review

Current Status of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Type II Diabetes

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 26, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26144362

Keywords

endoplasmic reticulum; endoplasmic reticulum stress; apoptosis; homeostasis; unfolded protein response; type II diabetes

Funding

  1. Malaysian Ministry of Higher Education [203/PPSP/6171215]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is vital for cellular functions, but disruptions in its homeostasis can lead to ER stress, linked to diseases like cancer, obesity, and diabetes. The mechanisms of ER stress related to chronic hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia in type II diabetes remain unclear.
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) plays a multifunctional role in lipid biosynthesis, calcium storage, protein folding, and processing. Thus, maintaining ER homeostasis is essential for cellular functions. Several pathophysiological conditions and pharmacological agents are known to disrupt ER homeostasis, thereby, causing ER stress. The cells react to ER stress by initiating an adaptive signaling process called the unfolded protein response (UPR). However, the ER initiates death signaling pathways when ER stress persists. ER stress is linked to several diseases, such as cancer, obesity, and diabetes. Thus, its regulation can provide possible therapeutic targets for these. Current evidence suggests that chronic hyperglycemia and hyperlipidemia linked to type II diabetes disrupt ER homeostasis, thereby, resulting in irreversible UPR activation and cell death. Despite progress in understanding the pathophysiology of the UPR and ER stress, to date, the mechanisms of ER stress in relation to type II diabetes remain unclear. This review provides up-to-date information regarding the UPR, ER stress mechanisms, insulin dysfunction, oxidative stress, and the therapeutic potential of targeting specific ER stress pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available