4.7 Article

Different reaction behaviours of the light and heavy components of bio-oil during the hydrotreatment in a continuous pack-bed reactor

Journal

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 146, Issue -, Pages 76-84

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.01.026

Keywords

Hydrotreatment; Bio-oil; Light and heavy species; Biofuel; LHSV

Funding

  1. ARENA as part of ARENA's Emerging Renewables Program
  2. Second Generation Biofuels Research and Development Grant Program
  3. Government of Western Australia via Low Emissions Energy Development Fund
  4. Government of Western Australia via Centre for Research into Energy for Sustainable Transport (CREST)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to investigate the hydrotreatment of bio-oil in a continuous packed-bed reactor at around 375 degrees C and 70 bar. The bio-oil was produced from the grinding pyrolysis of mallee wood in a grinding pyrolysis pilot plant. Our results indicate that the lighter and heavier components in the same bio-oil could behave very differently. Their behaviour can be affected very significantly by the overall bio-oil liquid hourly space velocity. While the residence time of the light species that evaporate instantly could be very short, the residence time of heavy species passing through the catalyst bed in the form of liquid could be very long. When a commercial pre-sulphided NiMo/Al2O3 catalyst came into contact with the heavy bio-oil species, significant exothermic reactions would take place, which result in the deactivation of hyperactive sites in the catalyst. The NiMo/Al2O3 catalyst used was less active in hydrotreating the heavier bio-oil species than in hydrotreating the lighter bio-oil species. However, even at very low extents of hydrotreatment, the bio-oil structure and properties, e.g. coking propensity, could be drastically improved. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available