4.7 Article

Highly oxygen-permeable and CO2-stable Ce0.8Sm0.2O2 - δ-SrCo0.9Nb0.1O3 - δ dual-phase membrane for oxygen separation

Journal

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 154, Issue -, Pages 19-26

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.07.009

Keywords

Oxygen separation; Ceramic membrane; Oxy-fuel; CO2-tolerance

Funding

  1. Innovative Research Team Program by the Ministry of Education of China [IRT13070]
  2. Project of Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  3. Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (TAPP)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dual-phase composite oxide 60 wt% Ce0.8Sm0.2O2 (- delta)-40 wt% SrCo0.9Nb0.1O3 (- delta) (60SDC-40SCN) which exhibits high oxygen permeability and good CO2 tolerance was developed. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and dense surface topography observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed a good compatibility of the two oxides. A high oxygen permeation flux of 1.54 mL min(-1) cm(-2) through the as-prepared dual-phase membrane (0.8 mm in thickness) was obtained under the gradient of air/He at 1223 K. In situ high-temperature X-ray diffraction demonstrated that SDC and SCN in 60SDC-40SCN membrane could retain their original phase structure from room temperature to 1223 K in CO2-containing atmosphere. The oxygen permeation fluxes of 60SDC-40SCN membrane showed a good reversibility when switching the sweep gas between CO2 and He. Comparing with single-phase SCN membrane, oxygen permeation flux of dual-phase 60SDC-40SCN membrane was more than twice when pure CO2 acted as the sweep gas, and the oxygen permeation flux could remain stable for 120 h. All the experimental results imply that dual-phase 60SDC-40SCN membrane has a great potential in oxy-fuel combustion process. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available