4.7 Article

Diagnostic and prognostic performance and longitudinal changes in plasma neurofilament light chain concentrations in adults with Down syndrome: a cohort study

Journal

LANCET NEUROLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 605-614

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00129-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AC Immune
  2. La Caixa Foundation
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  4. National Institute on Aging
  5. Wellcome Trust
  6. Jerome Lejeune Foundation
  7. Medical Research Council
  8. National Institute for Health Research
  9. EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Disease Research
  10. Alzheimer's society
  11. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  12. Stiftung fur die Erforschung von Verhaltens und Umwelteinflussen auf die menschliche Gesundheit
  13. NHS National Institute of Health Research Applied Research Collaborations East of England, UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study validated the clinical utility and prognostic value of plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) for diagnosing symptomatic Alzheimer's disease in individuals with Down syndrome. Results showed an increasing trend in NfL concentrations over time, supporting its use as a theragnostic marker in clinical trials.
Background Adults with Down syndrome are at an ultra-high risk of Alzheimer's disease, but diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in this population is challenging. We aimed to validate the clinical utility of plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) for the diagnosis of symptomatic Alzheimer's disease in Down syndrome, assess its prognostic value, and establish longitudinal changes in adults with Down syndrome. Methods We did a multicentre cohort study, including adults with Down syndrome (>= 18 years), recruited from six hospitals and university medical centres in France, Germany, Spain, the UK, and the USA, who had been assessed, followed up, and provided at least two plasma samples. Participants were classified by local clinicians, who were masked to biomarker data, as asymptomatic (ie, no clinical suspicion of Alzheimer's disease), prodromal Alzheimer's disease, or Alzheimer's disease dementia. We classified individuals who progressed along the Alzheimer's disease continuum during follow-up as progressors. Plasma samples were analysed retrospectively; NfL concentrations were measured centrally using commercial kits for biomarker detection. We used ANOVA to evaluate differences in baseline NfL concentrations, Cox regression to study their prognostic value, and linear mixed models to estimate longitudinal changes. To account for potential confounders, we included age, sex, and intellectual disability as covariates in the analyses. Findings Between Aug 2, 2010, and July 16, 2019, we analysed 608 samples from 236 people with Down syndrome: 165 (70%) were asymptomatic, 32 (14%) had prodromal Alzheimer's disease, and 29 (12%) had Alzheimer's disease dementia; ten [4%] participants were excluded because their classification was uncertain. Mean follow-up was 3.6 years (SD 1.6, range 0.6-9.2). Baseline plasma NfL concentrations showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 (95% CI 0.76-0.91) in the prodromal group and 0.94 (0.90-0.97) in the dementia group for differentiating from participants who were asymptomatic. An increase of 1 pg/mL in baseline NfL concentrations was associated with a 1.04-fold risk of clinical progression (95% CI 1.01-1.07; p=0.0034). Plasma NfL concentrations showed an annual increase of 3.0% (95% CI 0.4-5.8) per year in the asymptomatic non-progressors group, 11.5% (4.9-18.5) per year in the asymptomatic progressors group, and 16.0% (8.4-24.0) per year in the prodromal Alzheimer's disease progressors group. In participants with Alzheimer's disease dementia, NfL concentrations increased by a mean of 24.3% (15.3-34.1). Interpretation Plasma NfL concentrations have excellent diagnostic and prognostic performance for symptomatic Alzheimer's disease in Down syndrome. The longitudinal trajectory of plasma NfL supports its use as a theragnostic marker in clinical trials. Copyright (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available