4.7 Article

CT Muscle Density, D3Cr Muscle Mass, and Body Fat Associations With Physical Performance, Mobility Outcomes, and Mortality Risk in Older Men

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glab266

Keywords

Obesity; Outcomes; Physical performance; Sarcopenia

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Institute on Aging (NIA)
  3. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
  4. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) [U01 AG027810, U01 AG042124, U01 AG042139, U01 AG042140, U01 AG042143, U01 AG042145, U01 AG042168, U01 AR066160, UL1 TR000128]
  5. NIAMS [R01 AR065268]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that lower muscle mass and muscle density were independently associated with worse physical performance and adverse outcomes, while total body fat was minimally related to physical performance and not related to mobility outcomes or mortality.
Background: Muscle mass declines with age, while body adiposity increases. Sarcopenic obesity has been proposed to be particularly deleterious. However, previous methods for estimating muscle mass have been inadequate, and the relative contributions of total body fat versus muscle fat to adverse outcomes have been unclear. Method: In a large cohort of older men (N = 1 017), we measured muscle mass (D-3-creatine dilution), muscle density (high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the diaphyseal tibia) as a proxy of muscle fat, and total body fat (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry). We examined their associations with physical performance (walking speed, grip strength, chair stand time), the risk of mobility outcomes (mobility limitations, mobility disability), and the risk of death over similar to 5 years. Results: In combined models, lower muscle mass and muscle density were independently associated with worse physical performance and the risk of adverse outcomes, while total body fat was minimally related to physical performance and not related to mobility outcomes or mortality. For example, the relative risks for mortality per 1 standardized unit increase in muscle density, muscle mass, and total body fat were 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.74, 0.96), 0.70 (0.57, 0.86), and 0.90 (0.64, 1.25), respectively. Conclusions: Muscle mass and muscle density were associated with physical performance and adverse outcomes, and had independent, additive effects. There was little additional contribution of total body fat.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available