4.7 Review

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Cardiovascular Disease JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 10, Pages 1056-1067

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.06.045

Keywords

cardiac dysfunction; cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET); ME/CFS; orthostatic intolerance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a medically unexplained illness characterized by severe fatigue, unrefreshing sleep, exacerbation of symptoms after physical or mental efforts, and cardiovascular abnormalities. Reduced cardiac volumes and nocturnal blood pressure have been observed in ME/CFS patients.
Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a medically unexplained illness characterized by severe fatigue limiting normal daily activities for at least 6 months accompanied by problems with unrefreshing sleep, exacerbation of symptoms following physical or mental efforts (postexertional malaise [PEM]), and either cognitive reports or physiological evidence of orthostatic intolerance in the form of either orthostatic tachycardia and/or hypocapnia. Although rarely considered to have cardiac dysfunction, ME/CFS patients frequently have reduced stroke volume with a significant inverse relation between cardiac output and PEM severity. Magnetic resonance imaging of ME/CFS patients compared with normal control subjects found significantly reduced stroke, end-systolic, and end-diastolic volumes together with reduced end-diastolic wall mass. Another cardiovascular abnormality is reduced nocturnal blood pressure assessed by 24-hour monitoring. Autonomic dysfunction is also frequently observed with postural orthostatic tachycardia and/or hypocapnia. Two consecutive cardiopulmonary stress tests may provide metabolic data substantiating PEM. (C) 2021 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available