4.8 Article

Radical Aryl Migration from Boron to Carbon

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 143, Issue 25, Pages 9320-9326

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c04217

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  2. European Research Council (ERC) [692640]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a novel radical aryl migration from boron to carbon, leading to the synthesis of a series of arylated products with high diastereoselectivity under mild conditions. The reactions can be achieved through divergent chemistry starting from the same alkenylboronic acid ester, showing the potential for efficient and versatile synthesis of arylated compounds.
Radical aryl migration reactions represent a unique type of organic transformations that involve the intramolecular migration of an aryl group from a carbon or heteroatom to a C- or heteroatom-centered radical through a spirocyclic intermediate. Various elements, including N, O, Si, P, S, Sn, Ge, and Se, have been reported to participate in radical aryl migrations. However, radical aryl migration from a boron center has not been reported to date. In this communication, radical 1,5-aryl migration from boron to carbon in aryl boronate complexes is presented. C-radicals readily generated through radical addition onto alkenyl aryl boronate complexes are shown to engage in 1,5-aryl migration reactions to provide 4-aryl-alkylboronic esters. As boronate complexes can be generated in situ by the reaction of alkenylboronic acid esters with aryl lithium reagents, the aryl moiety is readily varied, providing access to a series of arylated products starting from the same alkenylboronic acid ester via divergent chemistry. Reactions proceed with high diastereoselectivity under mild conditions, and also the analogous 1,4-aryl shifts are feasible. The suggested mechanism is supported by DFT calculations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available