4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Different Food Sources of Fructose-Containing Sugars and Fasting Blood Uric Acid Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Feeding Trials

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 151, Issue 8, Pages 2409-2421

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxab144

Keywords

food sources of fructose-containing sugars; sugar-sweetened beverages; fruit; fruit juice; gout; uric acid; systematic review; meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Diabetes Canada [CS-5-15-4771-JS]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [129,920]
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  4. Ministry of Research and Innovation's Ontario Research Fund (ORF)
  5. CIHR Canada Graduate Scholarships Master's Award
  6. Loblaw Food as Medicine Graduate Award
  7. Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS)
  8. Mitacs-Elevate Postdoctoral Fellowship Award
  9. Toronto 3D Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship Award
  10. Banting and Best Diabetes Centre Postdoctoral Fellowship
  11. Toronto 3D Foundation
  12. St. Michael's Hospital Research Training Centre Scholarship
  13. Government of Canada through the Canada Research Chair Endowment
  14. PSI Graham Farquharson Knowledge Translation Fellowship
  15. Diabetes Canada Clinician Scientist award
  16. CIHR INMD/CNS (Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism, and Diabetes/Canadian Nutrition Society)
  17. Banting & Best Diabetes Centre Sun Life Financial New Investigator Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of fructose-containing sugars on uric acid levels is more mediated by food source than energy control. Evidence suggests that sugar-sweetened beverages increase uric acid levels, while 100% fruit juice decreases them. More high-quality trials investigating different food sources are needed to confirm these results.
Background: Although fructose as a source of excess calories increases uric acid, the effect of the food matrix is unclear. Objectives: To assess the effects of fructose-containing sugars by food source at different levels of energy control on uric acid, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched (through 11 January 2021) for trials >= 7 days. We prespecified 4 trial designs by energy control: substitution (energy-matched replacement of sugars in diets); addition (excess energy from sugars added to diets); subtraction (energy from sugars subtracted from diets); and ad libitum (energy from sugars freely replaced in diets) designs. Independent reviewers (>= 2) extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Results: We included 47 trials (85 comparisons; N = 2763) assessing 9 food sources [sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), sweetened dairy, fruit drinks, 100% fruit juice, fruit, dried fruit, sweets and desserts, added nutritive sweetener, and mixed sources] across 4 energy control levels in predominantly healthy, mixed-weight adults. Total fructose-containing sugars increased uric acid levels in substitution trials (mean difference, 0.16 mg/dL; 95% CI: 0.06-0.27 mg/dL; P = 0.003), with no effect across the other energy control levels. There was evidence of an interaction by food source: SSBs and sweets and desserts increased uric acid levels in the substitution design, while SSBs increased and 100% fruit juice decreased uric acid levels in addition trials. The certainty of evidence was high for the increasing effect of SSBs in substitution and addition trials and the decreasing effect of 100% fruit juice in addition trials and was moderate to very low for all other comparisons. Conclusions: Food source more than energy control appears to mediate the effects of fructose-containing sugars on uric acid. The available evidence provides reliable indications that SSBs increase and 100% fruit juice decreases uric acid levels. More high-quality trials of different food sources are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available