4.3 Article

iPick: Multiprocessing software for integrated NMR signal detection and validation

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE
Volume 328, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2021.106995

Keywords

Multidimensional NMR spectroscopy; Signal recognition; Peak validation; Noise level calculation; Graphical user interface; Multiprocessing; NMRFAM-SPARKY; POKY; Python

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DBI-2051595, DBI-1902076]
  2. University of Colorado Denver

Ask authors/readers for more resources

iPick is a tool for peak picking in biomolecular NMR spectroscopy, providing both a scripting tool and GUI for different user needs. It features multi-core CPU support, cross-platform compatibility, and ease of use. Users can achieve automated peak picking and validation through simple operations, improving data processing efficiency.
Peak picking is a critical step in biomolecular NMR spectroscopy. The program, iPick, presented here provides a scripting tool and a graphical user interface (GUI), which allow the user to perform interactive and intuitive peak picking and validation. The click-and-run GUI requires no computer programming skills, while the scripting tool can be used by more advanced users to customize the application. If used with a multi-core CPU, the multiprocessing feature of iPick reduces the processing time significantly by invoking parallel computing. The GUI is a plugin, compatible with the popular NMRFAM-SPARKY software package and its newly released successor, the POKY software. Features implemented in iPick include automated noise level detection and threshold setting, cross-validation against multiple spectra, and a method for quantifying peak reliability. The iPick software is cross-platform, open-source, and freely available from https://github.com/pokynmr/ipick. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available