4.5 Article

Infiltration through an Artificially Hydrophobized Silica Sand Barrier

Publisher

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002543

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Research Grant Council [16212818, AoE/E-603/18]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under the Excellent Youth Scientist Scheme [51922112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study conducted parametric infiltration tests to evaluate the effects of a hydrophobized barrier on water infiltration characteristics in soil. The results showed that the barrier could effectively prevent water infiltration under certain conditions.
Applying a layer of artificially hydrophobized soil barrier was proposed to minimize water infiltration in landfill covers and hence to reduce the formation of leachate. Existing research has focused on the hydrological behavior of hydrophobized soil, but its effectiveness in reducing or delaying infiltration to the underlying unsaturated soil has rarely been studied, especially under extreme wetting conditions. The objective of this study was to perform a series of parametric infiltration tests to quantify the water flow patterns within hydrophobized barriers and then evaluate their effects on the infiltration characteristics of loosely compacted silty underlying or overlying sand. The barrier was made of silica sand that was hydrophobized by 3% dimethyldichlorosilane (DMDCS; by weight). Constant-head ponding was applied on the soil surface. The test results revealed that the hydrophobized barrier could prevent the underlying soil from an increase in water content as long as the ponding head was less than the water-entry head (WEH) of the barrier. The barrier could become ineffective to prevent percolation when the mass portion of the hydrophobized sand was reduced or when the initial degree of saturation increased because of the reduction of WEH. (C) 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available