4.7 Article

Is collaborative governance effective for air pollution prevention? A case study on the Yangtze river delta region of China

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Volume 292, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112709

Keywords

Air pollution prevention; Collaborative governance; Institutional collective action (ICA); Regression discontinuity design (RDD); Urban governance

Funding

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [14BGL161]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the policy effects of collaborative governance for air pollution prevention in the Yangtze River Delta region and highlights the limited long-term impact of regional policies on reducing air pollutants, emphasizing the importance of inter-regional cooperation. The results indicate the need for clear division of responsibilities, balanced cost-benefit sharing, and coordinated enforcement to enhance the effectiveness of collaborative governance.
Collaborative governance plays an important role in air pollution prevention (APP). This paper aims to evaluate the policy effects of collaborative governance for APP in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region, analyze the collaborative mechanism from the perspective of institutional collective action (ICA) theory, and discuss its implications for improving the policy effects and regional collaboration. First, the causal relationship between collaborative environmental governance and air pollutant reduction is confirmed using the regression discontinuity design (RDD). However, it is also established that regional APP policies initiated by the Regional Cooperation Office of Yangtze River Delta (RCOYRD) did not have a long-term effect on reducing air pollutants. Second, initiative heterogeneity and administrative hierarchy heterogeneity of policy effects between cities are analyzed. It demonstrates that the mechanism formulated by RCOYRD has very limited impact on the reduction of transaction costs and collaborative risks of collaborative environmental governance. Third, clear division of responsibilities, balanced cost-benefit sharing, and coordinated enforcement between local governments are needed to improve the policy effects of collaborative governance for APP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available