Odds ratios are far from “portable”—A call to use realistic models for effect variation in meta-analysis
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Odds ratios are far from “portable”—A call to use realistic models for effect variation in meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
Baseline risk, Clinical guidance, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Correlation, Meta-analysis, Odds ratio, Risk ratio
Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2021-08-12
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.002
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Decreased susceptibility of marginal odds ratios to finite-sample bias
- (2021) Rachael K. Ross et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Is OR “portable” in meta-analysis? Time to consider bivariate generalized linear mixed model
- (2021) Mengli Xiao et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The odds ratio is “portable” but not the relative risk: Time to do away with the log link in binomial regression
- (2021) Suhail A. Doi et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Taken by Surprise
- (2020) Kenneth J Rothman AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Surprise!
- (2020) Stephen R Cole et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Meta-Analysis and Sparse Data Bias
- (2020) David B Richardson et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Semantic and cognitive tools to aid statistical science: replace confidence and significance by compatibility and surprise
- (2020) Zad Rafi et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Zero‐cell corrections in random‐effects meta‐analyses
- (2020) Frank Weber et al. Research Synthesis Methods
- Controversy and Debate: Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 1: A call for change to practice
- (2020) Suhail A. Doi et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Scientists rise up against statistical significance
- (2019) Valentin Amrhein et al. NATURE
- Moving to a World Beyond “p
- (2019) Ronald L. Wasserstein et al. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN
- Considerations when assessing heterogeneity of treatment effect in patient-centered outcomes research
- (2018) Catherine R. Lesko et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Re
- (2016) Amand F. Schmidt et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The Authors Respond
- (2016) Charles Poole et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Disengaging from statistical significance
- (2016) Kenneth J. Rothman EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Studying noncollapsibility of the odds ratio with marginal structural and logistic regression models
- (2016) Menglan Pang et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Statistical Foundations for Model-Based Adjustments
- (2015) Sander Greenland et al. Annual Review of Public Health
- Is the Risk Difference Really a More Heterogeneous Measure?
- (2015) Charlie Poole et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Standardized binomial models for risk or prevalence ratios and differences
- (2015) David B Richardson et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Conducting Meta-Analyses inRwith themetaforPackage
- (2015) Wolfgang Viechtbauer Journal of Statistical Software
- Re: "Estimating the Relative Risk in Cohort Studies and Clinical Trials of Common Outcomes"
- (2014) I. Karp AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Estimating predicted probabilities from logistic regression: different methods correspond to different target populations
- (2014) Clemma J Muller et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Adjustments and their Consequences-Collapsibility Analysis using Graphical Models
- (2011) Sander Greenland et al. INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW
- Bivariate random effects models for meta-analysis of comparative studies with binary outcomes: Methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk
- (2010) Haitao Chu et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Constructing Inverse Probability Weights for Marginal Structural Models
- (2008) S. R. Cole et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Interactions in Epidemiology: Relevance, Identification, and Estimation
- (2008) Sander Greenland EPIDEMIOLOGY
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExplorePublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More