4.3 Article

Characterization of Stable 12T SRAM with Improved Critical Charge

Journal

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0218126622500232

Keywords

Soft error; critical charge; CMOS; access time

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a twelve transistor SRAM cell is proposed to replace the conventional inverter with a Schmitt trigger-based inverter, leading to improved performance metrics compared to other designs. The proposed cell enhances critical charge, reduces errors, decreases leakage power, and improves read and write stability.
With the aggressive growth of the internet of things-based applications in the domestic and industrial domain, the embedded static memory is also under renovation stage to eliminate classical barriers such as soft errors, poor stability, and mediocre performance. In this work, a novel twelve transistors (12T) SRAM cell is presented that replaces the conventional inverter with Schmitt trigger-based inverter in core latch. The proposed SRAM circuit has been compared with four formerly reported designs for investigating the improvement in terms of various performance metrics. These designs include conventional six transistors (6T), tunable transistor 8T (T8T), PPN inverter-based 10T (PP10T), and stable low read power 11T (S11T) cells. The presented cell effectively minimizes the soft errors attributed to 1.36x/1.27x/1.66x/1.27x enhancement of critical charge compared to 6T/T8T/PP10T/S11T cells. Also, the proposed bit-cell effectively mitigates multi-bit-cell upsets because it allows bit interleaving array structure. The presented bit-cell also shows reduction in leakage power by 1.08x/1.33x/0.43x/1.28x in comparison to 6T/T8T/PP10T/S11T cells, respectively. The read and write stability of proposed bit-cell circuit is enhanced by 1.96x/1.88x/1x/1.92x and 1.15x/1.19x/1.29x/1.45x, respectively, in comparison to 6T/T8T/PP10T/S11T cells, respectively. In addition to this, proposed cell exhibits improvement in dynamic power, data retention voltage, and overall electrical quality matrix. Variability comparison of key design metrics such as read power and read current of the proposed SRAM circuit with 6T cell has also been presented in this work.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available