4.5 Article

Virtual scale function of gastrointestinal endoscopy for accurate polyp size estimation in real-time: a preliminary study

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.26.9.096002

Keywords

endoscopy; laser applications; image processing; real-time imaging; size estimation; virtual scale

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduced a virtual scale function for endoscopy, and demonstrated that the accuracy of polyp size estimation with the virtual scale was significantly higher than that obtained with biopsy forceps method through measurement error evaluation and comparison.
Significance: Polyp size is important for selecting the surveillance interval or treatment policy. Nevertheless, it is challenging to accurately estimate the polyp size during endoscopy. An easy and cost-effective function to assist in polyp size estimation is required. Aim: To propose a virtual scale function for endoscopy and evaluate its performance and expected accuracy. Approach: An adaptive virtual scale behavior was demonstrated. The measurement error of the virtual scale along the distance between the tip of the endoscope and the object plane was evaluated using graph paper. The accuracy of polyp size estimation by an expert endoscopist was compared with the accuracy of the biopsy forceps method using phantom images. Results: The measurement errors of the virtual scale were <= 0.7 mm when the distance to the graph paper, which faced the tip of the endoscope, varied from 4 to 30 mm. The accuracy with the virtual scale was significantly higher than that obtained with biopsy forceps (5.3 +/- 5.5% versus 11.9 +/- 9.4%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The virtual scale function, which operates in real-time without any additional device, can be used to estimate polyp sizes easily and accurately with endoscopy. (C) The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available