4.7 Article

Response rate and subjective memory after electroconvulsive therapy in depressive disorders with psychiatric comorbidity

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 292, Issue -, Pages 276-283

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.078

Keywords

Anxiety disorder; Alcohol use disorder; Personality disorder; Depression; Memory impairment; ECT

Funding

  1. Uppsala Universityhospital's research fund
  2. Swedish Research Council [201602362]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Response rates to electroconvulsive therapy in depression may be lower in patients with concurrent personality or anxiety disorders, but the majority of patients still respond positively. The impact of comorbidity decreases with higher age and severity of depressive episode; subjective ratings of memory impairment do not differ between patients with and without comorbidity.
Background: Response rates after and tolerability of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in depressive disorders with psychiatric comorbidity are uncertain. Methods: Data on patients with a depressive episode and a first course of ECT were collected from the Swedish National Quality Register for ECT. Logistic regression analyses, adjusted for gender, age, and depressive episode severity, were used to compare patients with and without comorbidity. The clinical response assessment Clinical Global Impression - Improvement Scale was used in 4413 patients and the memory item from the Comprehensive Psychiatric Rating Scale was used for subjective memory impairment rating after ECT in 3497 patients. Results: In patients with depressive disorder and comorbid personality disorder or anxiety disorder, 62.7% and 73.5%, respectively, responded after ECT compared with 84.9% in patients without comorbidity [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.55, and aOR 0.61, 95% CI 0.51-0.73, respectively]. The proportion of responding patients with comorbid alcohol use disorder was 77.1%, which was not significantly different from that in patients without comorbidity (aOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57-1.01). The impact of comorbidity decreased with higher age and depressive episode severity. Subjective ratings of memory impairment did not differ between patients with and without comorbidity. Limitations: Observational non-validated clinical data. Conclusions: The response rate after ECT in depression may be lower with concurrent personality disorder and anxiety disorder; however, the majority still respond to ECT. This implies that psychiatric comorbidity should not exclude patients from ECT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available