4.7 Review

Non-Canonical Helical Structure of Nucleic Acids Containing Base-Modified Nucleotides

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22179552

Keywords

C8-modification; C5-modification; methylation; bromination; arylation; Z-DNA; G-quadruplex; i-motif; triplex; non-canonical DNA

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A2C1006909, 2020R1C1C1013785, 2020R1I1A1A01070690]
  2. Samsung Science and Technology Foundation [SSTF-BA1701-10]
  3. KBSI grant [C030440]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1C1C1013785, 2020R1I1A1A01070690] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review article summarizes the synthesis methods of chemically modified nucleotides, focusing on the methylation, bromination, and arylation of purines and pyrimidines at specific positions. It also introduces the non-canonical structures of nucleic acids containing these modifications.
Chemically modified nucleobases are thought to be important for therapeutic purposes as well as diagnosing genetic diseases and have been widely involved in research fields such as molecular biology and biochemical studies. Many artificially modified nucleobases, such as methyl, halogen, and aryl modifications of purines at the C8 position and pyrimidines at the C5 position, are widely studied for their biological functions. DNA containing these modified nucleobases can form non-canonical helical structures such as Z-DNA, G-quadruplex, i-motif, and triplex. This review summarizes the synthesis of chemically modified nucleotides: (i) methylation, bromination, and arylation of purine at the C8 position and (ii) methylation, bromination, and arylation of pyrimidine at the C5 position. Additionally, we introduce the non-canonical structures of nucleic acids containing these modifications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available