4.7 Review

Failure of Immunotherapy-The Molecular and Immunological Origin of Immunotherapy Resistance in Lung Cancer

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22169030

Keywords

immunotherapy; tumor resistance; immune checkpoint inhibitors; lung cancer; tumor immune escape

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have a significant impact on clinical treatment outcomes in NSCLC, but many patients develop resistance to this therapy. Currently, there is a lack of reliable biomarkers for predicting sensitivity to immune therapy. Research is focused on using immunotherapy in combination with other treatment strategies to increase cancer immunogenicity by targeting immune checkpoints and the tumor microenvironment.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have a huge impact on clinical treatment results in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Blocking antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) or CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T cell antigen 4) have been developed and approved for the treatment of NSCLC patients. However, a large number of patients develop resistance to this type of treatment. Primary and secondary immunotherapy resistance are distinguished. No solid biomarkers are available that are appropriate to predict the unique sensitivity to immunotherapy. Knowledge of predictive markers involved in treatment resistance is fundamental for planning of new treatment combinations. Scientists focused research on the use of immunotherapy as an essential treatment in combination with other therapy strategies, which could increase cancer immunogenicity by generating tumor cells death and new antigen release as well as by targeting other immune checkpoints and tumor microenvironment. In the present review, we summarize the current knowledge of molecular bases underlying immunotherapy resistance and discuss the capabilities and the reason of different therapeutic combinations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available