4.7 Review

Plant Secondary Metabolites with an Overview of Populus

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22136890

Keywords

secondary metabolites; biosynthetic pathways; Populus

Funding

  1. Nanjing Forestry University [163108059]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Populus trees face continuous environmental challenges throughout their life cycle, exhibiting various defenses including the production of secondary metabolites. While many of these metabolites have been functionally described, their overall functions are still not fully understood. Research indicates therapeutic effects and leads to further study of secondary metabolites and their biosynthesis in Populus.
Populus trees meet continuous difficulties from the environment through their life cycle. To warrant their durability and generation, Populus trees exhibit various types of defenses, including the production of secondary metabolites. Syntheses derived from the shikimate-phenylpropanoid pathway are a varied and plentiful class of secondary metabolites manufactured in Populus. Amongst other main classes of secondary metabolites in Populus are fatty acid and terpenoid-derivatives. Many of the secondary metabolites made by Populus trees have been functionally described. Any others have been associated with particular ecological or biological processes, such as resistance against pests and microbial pathogens or acclimatization to abiotic stresses. Still, the functions of many Populus secondary metabolites are incompletely understood. Furthermore, many secondary metabolites have therapeutic effects, leading to more studies of secondary metabolites and their biosynthesis. This paper reviews the biosynthetic pathways and therapeutic impacts of secondary metabolites in Populus using a genomics approach. Compared with bacteria, fewer known pathways produce secondary metabolites in Populus despite P. trichocarpa having had its genome sequenced.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available