4.5 Article

Impact of a tiered discharge opioid algorithm on prescriptions and patient-reported outcomes after open gynecologic surgery

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER
Volume 31, Issue 7, Pages 1052-1060

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002674

Keywords

gynecologic surgical procedures; opioid-related disorders; postoperative care

Funding

  1. MD Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH/NCI) [P30 CA016672, CA217685, CA101642]
  2. NCI/NIH Improving Recovery After Major Cancer Surgery Using Patient-Reported Outcomes [R01CA205146]
  3. NIH [NCIK07-CA201013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared opioid prescribing practices before and after implementing a tiered opioid prescribing algorithm for women undergoing open gynecologic surgery. The results showed a significant reduction in the prescribed morphine equivalent dose after implementation, with no difference in post-operative refills or negative impact on patient-reported symptoms.
Objective To compare discharge opioid refills, prescribed morphine equivalent dose and quantity, and longitudinal patient-reported outcomes before and after implementation of a tiered opioid prescribing algorithm among women undergoing open gynecologic surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Methods We compared opioid prescriptions, clinical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes among 273 women. Post-discharge symptom burden was collected up to 42 days after discharge using the validated 27-item MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and analyzed using linear mixed effects models and Kaplan-Meier curves for symptom recovery. Results Among 113 pre-implementation and 160 post-implementation patients there was no difference in opioid refills (9.7% vs 11.3%, p=0.84). The post-implementation cohort had a significant reduction in median morphine equivalent dose (112.5 mg vs 225 mg, p<0.01), with no difference in median hospital length of stay (3 days vs 3 days, p=1.0) or 30-day readmission rate (9.4% vs 7.1%, p=0.66). There was no difference in patient-reported pain between the pre- and post-implementation cohorts on the day of discharge (severity 4.93 vs 5.14, p=0.53) or in any patient-reported symptoms, interference measures, or composite scores by post-discharge day 7. The median recovery time for most symptoms was 7 days, except for pain (14 days), fatigue (18 days), and physical interference (21 days), with no differences between cohorts. Conclusions After implementation of a tiered opioid prescribing algorithm, the quantity and dose of discharge opioids prescribed decreased with no change in post-operative refills and without negatively impacting patient-reported symptom burden or interference, which can be used to educate and reassure patients and providers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available