4.5 Article

Green sourcing in the era of industry 4.0: towards green and digitalized competitive advantages

Journal

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS
Volume 121, Issue 9, Pages 1997-2025

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-06-2020-0343

Keywords

Industry 4; 0; Digitalization; Decision-making; Fuzzy sets; Supply chain

Funding

  1. [TRC/CRP/MU/COVID-19/20/15]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The importance of sustainable sourcing decisions has increased due to government restrictions and public attention, with supply chain management seen as the next industrial revolution known as industry 4.0. Current supplier selection models may not efficiently prioritize suppliers, necessitating advanced models that integrate sustainability and industry 4.0 innovations. This study proposes a new framework for green and digitalized sourcing, utilizing fuzzy preference programming and multi-objective optimization for supplier prioritization. The approach enhances sourcing quality and represents a first attempt at green and digitalized supplier selection.
Purpose In the last decade, sustainable sourcing decision has gained tremendous attention due to the increasing governmental restrictions and public attentiveness. This decision involves diverse sets of classical and environmental parameters, which are originated from a complex, ambiguous and inconsistent decision-making environment. Arguably, supply chain management is fronting the next industrial revolution, which is named industry 4.0, due to the fast advance of digitalization. Considering the latter's rapid growth, current supplier selection models are, or it will, inefficient to assign the level of priority of each supplier among a set of suppliers, and therefore, more advanced models merging recipes of sustainability and industry 4.0 ingenuities are required. Yet, no research work found towards a digitalized, along with sustainability's target, sourcing. Design/methodology/approach A new framework for green and digitalized sourcing is developed. Thereafter, a hybrid decision-making approach is developed that utilizes (1) fuzzy preference programming (FPP) to decide the importance of one supplier attribute over another and (2) multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA) to prioritize suppliers based on fuzzy performance rating. The proposed approach is implemented in consultation with the procurement department of a food processing company willing to develop a greener supply chain in the era of industry 4.0. Findings The proposed approach is capable to recognize the most important evaluation criteria, explain the ambiguity of experts' expressions and having better discrimination power to assess suppliers on operational efficiency and environmental and digitalization criteria, and henceforth enhances the quality of the sourcing process. Sensitivity analysis is performed to help managers for model approval. Moreover, this work presents the first attempt towards green and digitalized supplier selection. It paves the way towards further development in the modelling and optimization of sourcing in the era of industry 4.0. Originality/value Competitive supply chain management needs efficient purchasing and production activities since they represent its core, and this arises the necessity for a strategic adaptation and alignment with the requirement of industry 4.0. The latter implies alterations in the avenue firms operate and shape their activities and processes. In the context of supplier selection, this would involve the way supplier assessed and selected. This work is originally initiated based on a joint collaboration with a food company. A hybrid decision-making approach is proposed to evaluate and select suppliers considering operational efficiency, environmental criteria and digitalization initiatives towards digitalized and green supplier selection (DG-SS). To this end, supply chain management in the era of sustainability and digitalization are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available