4.7 Article

Kinetic factors control trace element and isotope zoning in Archean pyrite corona nodules

Journal

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 315, Issue -, Pages 230-250

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2021.09.018

Keywords

Pyrite nodules; Trace elements; S isotope zonation; Pyrite partition coefficients; Neoarchean; Yilgarn Craton

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41973028, 41602340]
  2. Australian Research Council Linkage Project [LP110200747]
  3. Australian Research Council [LP110200747] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed pyrite corona nodules from the 2.7 billion-year-old Kapai Slate in Western Australia, revealing distinct compositional and isotopic zoning between cores and mantles. The cores are enriched in highly compatible trace elements, while the mantles are enriched in incompatible elements. Linear correlations were found between the compatible and incompatible elements, with isotopic zonation also observed. This research provides new constraints on the partitioning of trace elements between Archean ocean water and sedimentary pyrite.
Pyrite corona nodules from the-2.7 Ga Kapai Slate, a thin, sulfidic carbonaceous shale horizon interbedded with basaltic lava flows in the Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia, have concentric compositional and isotopic zoning with distinctive textural differences between cores and mantles. The sieved-textured cores are enriched in highly compatible trace elements, incl. Ni, As, Ag, Te, Sb, Bi and Pb, and depleted in incompatible Mo and Tl, whereas the radiating-textured mantles are strongly depleted in compatible elements and enriched in incompatible elements, relative to the cores. A striking feature of the data is that both the compatible and incompatible elements are linearly correlated, with correlation coefficients as high as 0.99. A marked drop in the concentration of compatible elements and an increase in incompatible elements at the core-mantle boundary is attributed to a sudden change in the rate of growth of the nodules produced by eruption of the voluminous overlying Paringa Basalt. The weight of the basalt produced sudden compaction of the unconsolidated clays below resulting in upward advection of pore fluid, which thinned the boundary layer around the growing nodules, leading to a marked increase in the rate of pyrite growth. Rapid pyrite growth led to a dramatic depletion in highly compatible elements, and to a build-up in incompatible elements, in the boundary layers around the growing nodule mantles, which resulted in extreme depletion of compatible elements, and enrichment in incompatible elements in the nodule mantles, relative to the cores. The corona nodules are also isotopically zoned with cores that have higher delta S-34, with small positive Delta S-33 values, and mantles that have lower delta S-34 and higher Delta S-33. The increase in Delta S-33 towards the rims is attributed to S-8 being advected to the growing mantles by upward fluid movement during sudden compaction, and the decrease in delta S-34 to the lighter S isotope, with its higher reactivity and diffusivity, being preferentially incorporated into the fast growing pyrite mantle. The extreme changes in the growth rates of the Kapai Slate corona pyrite nodules provide a new constraint on the partition coefficients of the trace elements between Archean ocean water and sedimentary pyrite. The compatibility of the analysed trace elements decreases in the order Bi > Te > Sb > Ag > Cu > Pb > Ni approximate to As > (Co, Zn, Se, Cd, Mn, W) > Tl > Mo, which is consistent with the order obtained from modern sedimentary pyrites by Large et al. (2014), except for the redox-sensitive elements Mn, Tl and Mo. These differences are attributed to the lower oxygen content of the Archean atmosphere and oceans. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available