4.6 Review

Association of levonorgestrel intrauterine devices with stress reactivity, mental health, quality of life and sexual functioning: A systematic review

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2021.100943

Keywords

Levonorgestrel intrauterine device; LNG-IUD; Hormonal contraception; Progestin; Mental health; Depression; Stress reactivity; Quality of life; Sexual functioning

Funding

  1. Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR) [13568859]
  2. DFG [DE2319/9-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of LNG-IUD on stress and mental health is unclear, but it seems to improve quality of life and sexual functioning. There is substantial variation in the quality of studies, highlighting the need for more high-quality research to assess the effects of LNG-IUD on brain function and structure, helping women make more informed choices regarding contraception.
Levonorgestrel-intrauterine-devices (LNG-IUD) are one of the most used contraceptive methods worldwide. While several reviews exist on how LNG-IUDs impact physiology and gynaecological functions, this systematic review focuses on stress, mental health, quality of life, sexual functioning, and effects on brain architecture. While data on stress is scarce, results on mental health are ambiguous. More consistently, LNG-IUD use seems to improve quality of life and sexual functioning. No studies highlighting the consequences of LNG-IUD use on the brain were found. The reviewed studies are characterized by a substantial variation in approaches, participant groups, and study quality. More high-quality research assessing the effects of LNG-IUD on mental health, including response to stressors and brain function and structure, is needed to identify women vulnerable to adverse effects of LNG-IUD, also in comparison to oral contraceptives, and to empower women to make more informed choices concerning hormonal contraception.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available