4.5 Article

Chondrogenic Differentiation of Rat Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Silk Fibroin/Chondroitin Sulfate/Hyaluronic Acid Ternary Scaffolds

Journal

FIBERS AND POLYMERS
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 324-332

Publisher

KOREAN FIBER SOC
DOI: 10.1007/s12221-016-5795-2

Keywords

Silk; Chondroitin sulfate; Hyaluronic acid; 3D scaffold; Properties; Differentiation

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51303141, 51403163]
  2. Educational Commission of Hubei Province, China [154004]
  3. Nature Science Foundation of Wuhan Textile University [153095, 153043]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cartilage repair is a challenge in bone tissue reconstruction. In this study, silk fibroin (SF), chondroitin sulfate (CS) and hyaluronic acid (HA) were employed to fabricate scaffolds for tissue engineered cartilage by freeze drying technique. The secondary pores were formed in the main pores of SF/CS/HA scaffold which improved the pore connectivity and equilibrium swelling of the scaffold. Furthermore, rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells were seeded on the scaffolds to evaluate the cell adhesion and proliferation. Results of hematoxylin/eosin staining and cell counting kit-8 assay showed that the cells migration and differentiation of SF/CS/HA (80/15/5) scaffold were better than that of SF/CS/HA scaffolds with different ratios after 7 days culture. Moreover, immunohistochemistry and scanning electron microscope demonstrated that large amounts of collagen II and proteoglycans of the cells were expressed in the SF/CS/HA 3D scaffold, while the expression of collagen I was barely visible by immunohistochemistry. Abound of extracellular matrix was formed to morphologically round and distributed uniformly throughout the scaffolds. The 3D ternary scaffold could promote the cells chondrogenic differentiation without using any inductive agent and offer potential for cartilage tissue regeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available