4.2 Review

Pharmacological strategies for improving the prognosis of glioblastoma

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY
Volume 22, Issue 15, Pages 2019-2031

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1948013

Keywords

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) t-cell therapy; chemotherapy; drug delivery; glioblastoma; immunotherapy; liposomes; polymersomes; vaccine

Funding

  1. Sarnoff Cardiovascular Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Advancements in brain cancer treatment have focused on combination therapies, immunotherapy, and drug delivery platforms. Beyond the treatments approved in 1996 and 2005, recent research on GBM has led to the development of new therapeutic approaches. Novel pharmacotherapies for GBM are currently being evaluated in clinical trials based on promising preclinical data.
Introduction: Treatments for brain cancer have radically evolved in the past decade due to a better understanding of the interplay between the immune system and tumors of the central nervous system (CNS). However, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains the most common and lethal CNS malignancy affecting adults. Areas covered: The authors review the literature on glioblastoma pharmacologic therapies with a focus on trials of combination chemo-/immunotherapies and drug delivery platforms from 2015 to 2021. Expert opinion: Few therapeutic advances in GBM treatment have been made since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the BCNU-eluting wafer, Gliadel, in 1996 and oral temozolomide (TMZ) in 2005. Recent advances in our understanding of GBM have promoted a wide assortment of new therapeutic approaches including combination therapy, immunotherapy, vaccines, and Car T-cell therapy along with developments in drug delivery. Given promising preclinical data, these novel pharmacotherapies for the treatment of GBM are currently being evaluated in various stages of clinical trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available