4.7 Article

Numerical study on design rules for minimum degree of shear connection in propped steel-concrete composite beams

Journal

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES
Volume 241, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112466

Keywords

Degree of shear connection; Composite construction; Shear connection; Numerical model; Finite element model

Funding

  1. ArcelorMittal Global R&D - Long Products - Luxembourg

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the performance of simply supported propped composite beams with ductile shear connectors using finite element analysis. The revised rules are found to reduce the risk of slip in the structures.
This manuscript presents a numerical study on simply supported propped composite beams with ductile shear connectors subjected to uniformly distributed load. The aim is to assess the performance of the revised rules for the minimum degree of shear connection (CEN/TC250/SC4.T3) with respect to the occurring slip. First, a nonlinear 3D finite element model was developed through the software ABAQUS 2017 and validated against analytical and full-scale beam test results. Then, 91 configurations were analysed for different degrees of shear connection eta = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0. The span ranges from 6 to 25 m while the geometrical and mechanical properties varied within their typical field of applicability. According to both current and revised rules, 16 configurations with relatively deep beam and weak concrete slab exhibited allowable slip values smax significantly higher than 6 mm. Therefore, the authors proposed a reduction of the maximum degree of utilization to these special cases. If the proposed reduction is included in the revised rules, none of the considered cases exhibit a slip smax higher than 8 mm while few cases have smax between 6 and 8 mm. For the ease of use, a design proposal is reformulated as a conditional reduction of the plastic bending resistance of the composite section.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available