4.7 Article

Assessment of Model-Based peak electric consumption prediction for commercial buildings

Journal

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
Volume 245, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111031

Keywords

Demand Response (DR); Demand side management (DSM); Energy efficiency (EE); Measurement and verification (M&V)

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC0205CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated whether advanced M&V regression approaches offer improvements over simpler averaging approaches for peak load prediction in commercial buildings. The findings showed that regression methods did not offer a notable advantage over commonly used averaging methods, and tended to understate achieved load reductions in demand response applications for these buildings.
Utility programs have successfully delivered energy efficiency for decades. Today, increasing emphasis is being placed on demand response (DR) programs that incentivize customers to reduce, or shed electric load during grid peak periods. The most common methods used to predict building peaks and quantify DR load reductions rely on simple averaging algorithms using hourly load and temperature data from the days preceding the DR event. In contrast, regression-based algorithms have been used for decades to quantify annual energy efficiency savings. The availability of smart meter data has enabled application of hourly regressions for more accurate energy savings estimation, often referred to as advanced measurement and verification (M & V).& rdquo; This project explored whether advanced M&V regression approaches offer improvements over simpler averaging approaches for peak load prediction in commercial buildings. We present evaluation results for eight algorithms (based on three baseline modeling approaches). The findings show that all algorithms underpredicted consumption across 453 meters and over 1,100 peak load days. Median bias values varied between 4.5 and 18.7 percent, indicating that the methods evaluated would tend to understate achieved load reductions in DR applications for these buildings. The regression methods did not offer a notable advantage over the commonly used averaging methods. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available