4.5 Article

An Assessment of the Energy Poverty and Gender Nexus towards Clean Energy Adoption in Rural South Africa

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14123708

Keywords

energy poverty; energy poverty and gender nexus; firewood; gendered energy poverty (GEP); indoor air pollution; rural South Africa; women and girls

Categories

Funding

  1. University Research Committee (URC) fund from the University of Johannesburg, South Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

South Africa has approximately 2.5 million households without electricity access, with most located in rural areas and urban informal settlements. Gendered energy poverty in these areas exposes women and girls to security, health, and economic challenges, requiring mitigation strategies through clean energy adoption.
South Africa has about 2.5 million households without electricity access, most of which are located in rural areas and urban informal settlements. The nexus of energy poverty and gender is at play in the affected communities, as women and girls are culturally stereotyped with the task of collecting unclean fuels (e.g., firewood) and using these for their households' energy demands. Therefore, this study prioritized rural women and girls as respondents in the provinces most affected by gendered energy poverty (GEP) in the country. The study was carried out in selected rural unelectrified areas of Limpopo, Mpumalanga, and KwaZulu-Natal provinces using structured interviews. The study revealed that GEP in the rural areas has exposed women and girls living there to security concerns, health hazards, premature death, domestic fire accidents, time poverty, income poverty, illiteracy, drudgery in households and farm tasks, etc., at different levels of severity. It also showed the effects of perceptions, age, income, and culture on the choice of energy use among the respondents. Mitigation strategies against GEP in rural South African communities through clean energy adoption are also proposed in this paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available