4.6 Article

Optimal financing strategies with 3PL customized service in a capital-constrained supply chain

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101090

Keywords

3PL financing; Customized service; Revenue-sharing contract; Risk aversion

Funding

  1. Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [71731010]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [72171214, 71571174, 71801203]
  3. Key Research and Development Project of Anhui Province [201904a07020040]
  4. Key Education Department Project of Anhui Province [SK2020A0388]
  5. Key Project of West Anhui University [wxsk201923]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explores the optimal financing strategy in the context of customized service, analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of bank financing and 3PL financing, and providing different optimal choices based on revenue-sharing ratio and retailer risk preferences.
Consumers are becoming more customized-conscious and customized service becomes particularly important. We suppose that 3PL firm and the newsvendor-like retailer are risk-neutral profit maximizers, and the retailer is capital-constrained, needing short-term financing. Considering customized service, we mainly discuss two financing sources: bank financing and 3PL financing, where the customized service level is determined by the retailer or 3PL firm. The results show that the optimal financing strategy depends on the ratio of revenue-sharing. When the ratio is within a certain range, 3PL financing is the optimal strategy, achieving a win-win outcome. This paper also discusses a case where the retailer has risk aversion behavior. We reach an interesting conclusion. When the retailer has extremely risk-averse attitude, bank financing might be the optimal financing strategy. When the retailer is relatively optimistic, 3PL financing is a wise choice. These conclusions give us some meaningful management inspirations in light of customized service.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available