4.7 Review

The social implications of Submarine Groundwater Discharge from an Ecosystem Services perspective: A systematic review

Journal

EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 221, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103742

Keywords

Submarine groundwater discharge; Coastal Ocean; Ecosystem Services; Social implications; SGD-ES

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, through the Maria de Maeztu programme for Units of Excellence [CEX2019-000940-M]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya (MERS) [2017 SGR - 1588]
  3. project OPAL [PID2019-110311RB-C21]
  4. ICTA Unit of Excellence (MinECo) [MDM2015-0552-17-1]
  5. Spanish government's Research Agency through a Ramon y Cajal research fellowship [RYC-2015-17676]
  6. Beatriu de Pinos postdoctoral program of the Generalitat de Catalunya autonomous government [2019-BP-00241]
  7. Generalitat de Catalunya autonomous government [2017FI_B_00365]
  8. Foundation Iniciatives del Mediterrani
  9. [BES-2017-080740]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically examines the social implications of Submarine Groundwater Discharge (SGD) using an Ecosystem Service perspective, revealing a focus on supporting services and a lack of research on cultural services. Through a detailed review of literature and case studies, it is shown that Ecosystem Services can have multiple synergies and trade-offs, resulting in unequal impacts among stakeholder groups.
Submarine Groundwater Discharge (SGD) is recognized as a fundamental hydrological process that supports many coastal biogeochemical cycles and social-ecological systems. However, very little has been investigated about how SGD affects society and, specifically, human well-being. This study systematically examines the published scientific literature on the social implications of SGD by using an Ecosystem Service (ES) perspective. Coastal services provided by ecosystems dependent on SGD are analyzed and clustered in the four main categories of Ecosystem Services (i.e., Provisioning, Supporting, Regulating and Cultural), which are in turn divided into subcategories defined as outcomes. This allows identifying and discussing both benefits and threats to coastal societies resulting from SGD outcomes. From the 1532 articles initially reviewed, the most frequently mentioned category was the supporting services (835) due to the mainstream trend in scientific literature to focus on the role of SGD as a process influencing coastal biogeochemical cycles. Conversely, cultural ES were mentioned in only 49 cases, which should not necessarily be interpreted as a lack of research or interest in this topic, but that this type of references are often not found in the scientific literature but in the grey literature. A detailed publication review was additionally conducted, identifying 114 case-studies from 96 different locations worldwide that reported cases in which SGD had social implications on the well-being. Our review also shows how the different types of Ecosystem Services can have multiple synergies and trade-offs between them, resulting in unequal impacts among stakeholder groups. Overall, this study identifies research gaps related to Ecosystem Services provided by SGD as well as opportunities for further studies, while developing an analytical framework that relies on the Ecosystem Services approach to guide future research on the social implications of SGD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available