4.8 Article

The human brain uses spatial schemas to represent segmented environments

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 21, Pages 4677-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.08.012

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FULBRIGHT fellowship
  2. Zuckerman STEM Leadership fellowship
  3. NIH [R01EY022350, R01EY031286]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research indicates that humans mentally segment complex environments into subspaces, even when all parts are visible. Neurocognitive mechanisms show that people use both local spatial schemas and integrated spatial maps to represent segmented environments.
Humans and animals use cognitive maps to represent the spatial structure of the environment. Although these maps are typically conceptualized as extending in an equipotential manner across known space, psychological evidence suggests that people mentally segment complex environments into subspaces. To understand the neurocognitive mechanisms behind this operation, we familiarized participants with a virtual courtyard that was divided into two halves by a river; we then used behavioral testing and fMRI to understand how spatial locations were encoded within this environment. Participants' spatial judgments and multivoxel activation patterns were affected by the division of the courtyard, indicating that the presence of a boundary can induce mental segmentation even when all parts of the environment are co-visible. In the hippocampus and occipital place area (OPA), the segmented organization of the environment manifested in schematic spatial codes that represented geometrically equivalent locations in the two subspaces as similar. In the retrosplenial complex (RSC), responses were more consistent with an integrated spatial map. These results demonstrate that people use both local spatial schemas and integrated spatial maps to represent segmented environment. We hypothesize that schematization may serve as a general mechanism for organizing complex knowledge structures in terms of their component elements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available