4.7 Article

Characterization of concrete containing RCA and GGBFS: Mechanical, microstructural and environmental properties

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 289, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123134

Keywords

RCA; GGBFS; Mechanical properties; Impact resistance; Global warming potential; Two-parameter Weibull

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the use of ecoefficient concrete by replacing natural aggregates with recycled concrete aggregates and ordinary Portland cement with ground granulated blast furnace slag. The results showed negative effects on workability, compressive strength, and impact resistance, but positive effects on global warming potential. Using up to 50% RCA and 30% GGBFS is recommended based on the optimization results.
This study presents the results of an experimental/analytical investigation on the development of ecoefficient concrete. In this study, natural aggregates (NA) were replaced by recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) with amounts of 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% by volume. In addition, ordinary Portland cement (OPC) was replaced with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) with amounts of 0, 15, 30, and 45% by volume. Workability and the hardened state properties such as the ultrasonic pulse velocity, the water absorption, the compressive strength, the splitting tensile strength, the flexural strength, and the impact resistance of twenty mixtures were assessed. This study also includes global warming potential (GWP) assessment. The results show that the use of RCA and GGBFS had a negative effect on workability, compressive strength and impact resistance and positive effect on GWP. Finally, given the results of the optimization, the use of RCA up to 50 vol% and the use of GGBFS up to 30 vol% is recommended. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available