Why you need to include human factors in clinical and empirical studies ofin vitropoint of care devices? Review and future perspectives
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Why you need to include human factors in clinical and empirical studies ofin vitropoint of care devices? Review and future perspectives
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Expert Review of Medical Devices
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 405-416
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2016-02-15
DOI
10.1586/17434440.2016.1154277
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Work Domain Analysis for understanding medication safety in care homes in England: an exploratory study
- (2015) Rosemary H.M. Lim et al. ERGONOMICS
- Introduction to the Special Issue on Usability and User Experience: Psychometrics
- (2015) James R. Lewis INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION
- Current and Future Challenges in Point-of-Care Technologies: A Paradigm-Shift in Affordable Global Healthcare With Personalized and Preventive Medicine
- (2015) Atam P. Dhawan et al. IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine-JTEHM
- Comparison of fasting plasma glucose and haemoglobin A1c point-of-care tests in screening for diabetes and abnormal glucose regulation in a rural low income setting
- (2014) Roy William Mayega et al. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Current and future use of point-of-care tests in primary care: an international survey in Australia, Belgium, The Netherlands, the UK and the USA
- (2014) J. Howick et al. BMJ Open
- Human factors systems approach to healthcare quality and patient safety
- (2013) Pascale Carayon et al. APPLIED ERGONOMICS
- Primary care clinicians’ attitudes towards point-of-care blood testing: a systematic review of qualitative studies
- (2013) Caroline HD Jones et al. BMC Family Practice
- State of science: human factors and ergonomics in healthcare
- (2013) Sue Hignett et al. ERGONOMICS
- Attitudes to rapid HIV testing among Spanish General Practitioners
- (2013) C Agustí et al. HIV MEDICINE
- Point of care troponin testing: Rules and regulations
- (2013) Giuseppe Lippi et al. JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY
- Incorporating trust-in-technology into Expectation Disconfirmation Theory
- (2013) Nancy Lankton et al. JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS
- Diagnostic Accuracy of a Point-of-Care Blood Typing Kit Conducted by Potential End Users
- (2013) Diane R. Bienek et al. MILITARY MEDICINE
- The science of human factors: separating fact from fiction
- (2013) Alissa L Russ et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Point-of-care tests in general practice: Hope or hype?
- (2013) Jochen Cals et al. European Journal of General Practice
- Design, implementation and initial assessment of the Northern Territory Point-of-Care Testing Program
- (2012) Mark D.S. Shephard et al. Australian Journal of Rural Health
- Evaluating the implementation of nurse-initiated HIV rapid testing in three Veterans Health Administration substance use disorder clinics
- (2012) E E Conners et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS
- The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers' perspectives
- (2011) Arthur G Money et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Web log analysis: a review of a decade of studies about information acquisition, inspection and interpretation of user interaction
- (2011) Maristella Agosti et al. DATA MINING AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY
- A multi-country qualitative study of clinicians' and patients' views on point of care tests for lower respiratory tract infection
- (2011) F. Wood et al. FAMILY PRACTICE
- The Impact of Cognitive Style on User Preference Based on Usability and Aesthetics for Computer-Based Systems
- (2011) Sangwon Lee et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION
- Point-of-care HIV testing at antenatal care and maternity sites: experience in Battambang Province, Cambodia
- (2011) T Heller et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STD & AIDS
- Time to accelerate integration of human factors and ergonomics in patient safety: Table 1
- (2011) Ayse P Gurses et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- A provider participatory implementation model for HIV testing in an ED
- (2010) Jennifer C. Chen et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
- Systems mapping workshops and their role in understanding medication errors in healthcare
- (2010) P. Buckle et al. APPLIED ERGONOMICS
- Designing packaging to support the safe use of medicines at home
- (2010) James Ward et al. APPLIED ERGONOMICS
- Patient satisfaction with point-of-care testing in general practice
- (2010) Caroline O Laurence et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
- Point of care troponin decreases time in the emergency department for patients with possible acute coronary syndrome: a randomised controlled trial
- (2010) C. Loten et al. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL
- Systems modelling approaches to the design of safe healthcare delivery: ease of use and usefulness perceived by healthcare workers
- (2010) Gyuchan Thomas Jun et al. ERGONOMICS
- Understanding user preferences based on usability and aesthetics before and after actual use
- (2010) Sangwon Lee et al. INTERACTING WITH COMPUTERS
- C-reactive protein point-of-care testing for lower respiratory tract infections: a qualitative evaluation of experiences by GPs
- (2009) J. W L Cals et al. FAMILY PRACTICE
- Health care process modelling: which method when?
- (2009) G. T. Jun et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE
- Feasibility, cost-effectiveness and patients’ acceptance of point-of-care INR testing in a hospital-based anticoagulation clinic
- (2008) Ming Chai Kong et al. ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY
- General practitioners’ perceptions of introducing near-patient testing for common infections into routine primary care: A qualitative study
- (2008) Christopher C. Butler et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started